Category: Old News

  • Who to blame for the missing explosives? Hmm….

    Statement from Joe Lockhart on Bush Campaign’s Latest Excuse for Missing Explosives

    Washington, DC – Kerry-Edwards advisor Joe Lockhart issued the following statement today:

    “Early this morning, we learned the Bush campaign’s latest strategy for dealing with the missing explosives in Iraq. Today, the Bush campaign booked its number one surrogate and convention keynoter, Rudy Guiliani, on America’s top rated morning show and his message was clear, simple and incredible. He said:

    “‘The actual responsibility for it really would be for the troops that were there. Did they search carefully enough? Didn’t they search carefully enough?’

    This is just the latest example of the excuse presidency where the buck stops any place but the Oval Office.”

    Via Rapid Response Center Kerry Blog…

    Kerry on Missing Explosives and Bush’s Excuses:

    “This week’s revelations about the missing explosives speaks to the president’s continuing misjudgments in Iraq. According to the commanders on the ground, our forces were not ordered to secure a weapons dump in Iraq where 380 tons of explosives were stored. Now, the president’s former chief weapons inspector says it’s likely that these explosives are being used against our own troops. The president’s shifting explanations and excuses demonstrate, once again, that this president believes the buck stops anywhere but his desk.


  • “Bush’s Big Joke”

    “Bush’s Big Joke”


  • Quick post

    100 Facts and 1 Opinion

    Variety on the Jon Stewart Crossfire clip: “Stats from IFilm.com show it generated 1.4 million viewings in just six days, making it the most watched TV clip ever and one of the most popular videos of any type on the site,”

    Errol Morris: Republican Switcher ads. Worth watchin a few…

    Watch Ashlee Simpson miss her lip sync queue and then just bomb on SNL. (~3MB WMV)

    NWA


  • Readers and other naive thoughts

    My propaganda:

    Well ever since I’ve had this Chatango thing I’ve been feeling pretty good about the ridiculous amount of time I’ve spent on my blog. This little chat box (lower left) allows me to chat with people who are dropping by the site. I’ve met some interesting folks who’ve admitted they are “regular readers.” Some of these people have said they’ve “learned about politics” and even “watch less TV.” For little old me hearing that is quite fulfilling. The notion that people actually get something from my humble little bloggy is very pleasing. The weird part is that i’ve heard this from more than one cat. The site did like 1000 – 4000 unique visitors yesterday depending on what statistics tracking system I look at. Most of these peeps are just punks google searching this or that and that kinda bums me out. Nonetheless the server logs for my site now show more and more individuals are coming directly to the site. These “readers” just come directly to the site. They’re not not referred by google or other sites. This means people are bookmarking the site and coming back to it directly. I like knowing that in some tiny little way I get to have my say. Thank you readers.

    Other people’s propaganda:

    Is it just me or is the weeb being flooded with movies being created by peeps just like you and me? I think this is an awesome trend. Whether its that What Barry Says Video or this new one REVOLUTION: WORLD OF EVIL. This is what I’ve been raving about for ages! Its now happening! Videobloggers are taking over! No seriously, I couldn’t be happier with all these folks putting up video that you and I would NEVER see on our TVs. There’s also a ton of people remixing regular old TV. Finally there’s all that regular TV you should have seen but didn’t happen to be watching. Look at this Jon Stewart clip. Ifilm.com has played this clip over 1 million times. That doesn’t include all the people who watched it off the torrents or direct downloads. What does this all mean? Why don’t we ask Bill Gate$. Bill what do you think? “The ideal for many content people would be that they just put their content on the Internet and then they have a direct relationship with the viewer,” Gates said. “That model for low-volume content is the future.” Yes Bill it is. Strongbad voice: TOO BAD MY PVR RUNS ON LINUX BIATCH AND YOU CAN’T CONTROL IT!!!!. Gate$ wants side by side screens and ads which seems ridiculous to me. Then again, this whole internet is turning into “interactive TV” idea is nothing new. What is new in my view is the amount of material that is being created/remixed/mashed-up by john doe internet user. Why am I so interested? I’m interested because people are having their own say and leaning forward. Why should you be interested? The “future computer” that runs your apartment/house/pad/cave will have wonderfully diverse content on it for your to watch/interact/listen/ that came from “cyberspace” and was created for the love not the money. There’s an interesting discussion about this here.

    As Do you think Rap should be used in schools? would say: Booyakasha.

    Here’s a few “Radical” videos courtesy of the “internet”:

    Revolution: World of Evil.

    What Barry Says.

    PVRs are cool.



    HOLY LINKS OF NOTE!

    WheelBarrow Freestyle is just a wannabe of the sport my brother and his buddy invented: FREESTYLE WALKING.

    Interactive MINDBALL!

    American Passports to Get Chipped

    Republican Switchers

    holographic TV?

    Photos for Peace

    Spider-man!

    Ipod G5

    Get more Fiber in your diet.

    New way to organize blogosphere ideas? Sparklines? Pretty tech.

    This is what I have to say about the Baseball:

    u take sports way to seriously


  • Sinclair RETREATS!

    Sinclair Retreats on Kerry Film

    More on this win for the blogosphere.


  • So many jackasses so little time.

    Bill O’Reilly you jackass! You are finally getting what you deserve, pervert. What goes around comes around.

    On another note: Why the hell are all these pro-Kerry blogs echoing the fact that the republicans are upset that Kerry mentioned Cheney’s daughter? Who cares? Move on! Anyone who actually watched the debate an Kerry’s remarks we’re not inappropriate at all. Rove and his peeps just like the idea that Kerry could look bad for mentioning Cheney’s daughter. If they hammer it hard enough people will forget BUSH LOST THE DEBATE. That is the people that are easy to manipulate, AKA those that have no interest in the debates and only hear the sound bytes…

    Keep the pressure on Sinclair folks. Don’t let them air this propaganda piece the night before the election. Also, Sinclair’s website is blatantly lying, the film has been shot, you can download it from the “stolen honour” site. Salon.com’s Eric Boehlert notes that “The right-wing network’s decision to force its affiliates to air anti-Kerry propaganda is one of the lowest moments in the history of television news, says the former head of the FCC. And it may unleash a backlash.” Well in my opinion it already has unleashed a backlash…

    Searching photos on Flickr is a great way to procrastinate.

    Retropod: Shut Down. Sony sure is doing a great job of making themselves look even lamer!

    E-voting. Yes its going to fuck up.

    William Gibson is blogging again.

    10 years of the weeb. 10 findings that are not particularly surprising

    Get your .mov on: (mov rhymes with groove) Daily Show Comedy Clips Archives and undergroundclips are both pretty sweet. Speaking of sweet, check out these shirts: founditemclothing.com

    I haven’t gotten into podcasting yet but you can get your podcast on here: podcast repository

    In case you didn’t know Ann Coulter is an ass, and an anorexic one at that.

    The huge white spot is at the top left of the site is where the Google ads are supposed to be… The folks at Google got all pissy that I was giving away Gmail accounts to people who sent in funny photos. I emailed them and they realized that I was in fact promoting Gmail. Maybe it was just a bot that halted the ads? Whatever, either way that big white spot will soon be back to its full sell out glory soon. The ads are meant to pay for the hosting of this beyotch and they do that and more!


  • Kerry 3, Bush 0.

    Bush “not concerned” about Bin Laden…(~2MB .wmv)


  • The power of blogs

    The power of blogs?  Hmm lets see if they have teeth:

    Remember the Sinclair Broadcast Group?  Well the people at this network are planning on airing a piece of anti-Kerry propaganda the night before the election.  Bloggers are saying fuck that!  This is propaganda NOT NEWS and we will not stand for it!  Bloggers have taken to calling companies that advertise on the Sinclair stations and saying we’re not going to buy your products when you advertise with these schmucks…  Seems to be working.  Hit them where it counts, the bottom line.  Want to take actionTry here too…  Contact the local companies that advertise with them and speak with the Sales Manager.  Tell him/her how you aren’t going to buy your car from them anymore if they continue to advertise with Sinclair.  Is this just rumors on the internets? No!

    Will this be another victory for the blogosphere?  More on this:

    Or email Sinclair’s CEO: dsmith@sbgnet.com

    Or Contact the FCC

    StopSinclair.org

    List of companies that advertise with Sinclair:

    Sinclairwatch.org

    Sinclair under fire for Kerry film.

    Sinclair: ‘Attackumentary’ = News.

    Talking Points Memo

    Sinclair’s VP suggested that the other networks decision to not show this POS film is akin to holocaust deniers.

    Holocaust Remark by Sinclair Exec "Inappropriate"

    Daily Kos :: Sylvan Learning Center pulls ads from Sinclair

    TV channels to rubbish Kerry on eve of poll



    Receptacle

    What are other bigidybloggers sayin about this Sinclair Fiasco?

    An FCC commissioner has already denounced this piece:

    Drudge:

    "FCC COMMISSIONER COPPS CRITICIZES SINCLAIR CORPORATE DECISION TO PREEMPT LOCAL STATIONS FOR POLITICAL BROADCAST

    Commissioner Michael J. Copps reacted to reports that Sinclair Broadcast Group will preempt more than 60 local stations across the country to air an overtly political program in the days prior to the Presidential election.

    Copps stated: “This is an abuse of the public trust.  And it is proof positive of media consolidation run amok when one owner can use the public airwaves to blanket the country with its political ideology — whether liberal or conservative.  Some will undoubtedly question if this is appropriate stewardship of the public airwaves. This is the same corporation that refused to air Nightline’s reading of our war dead in Iraq.  It is the same corporation that short-shrifts local communities and local jobs by distance-casting news and weather from hundreds of miles away.  It is a sad fact that the explicit public interest protections we once had to ensure balance continue to be weakened by the Federal Communications Commission while it allows media conglomerates to get even bigger.  Sinclair, and the FCC, are taking us down a dangerous road.”

     

    Links of a lighter note:

    Gothamist: Commute By Pod

    Core77 and Timex present 2154: The Future of Time Design Competition

    Second life weirdos stream the debate

    Funny images: 1 2.

    Martha’s Jailhouse Hooch.  Sik.


  • Pick Your President

    Pick Your President


  • CHENEY VS REALITY: Safety & Security

    Cheney thinks he never met Edwards! What a moron!

    Vpdebate

    Cheneyedwards

    REALITY: There is more that we could do to improve security in the homeland

    Bush Has Allowed Airline Security Gaps To Persist, Threatening Our Safety.Under Bush’s management, TSA has failed to develop a comprehensive strategy to identify security weaknesses at commercial airports despite spending $10.7 Billion on aviation security measures. Less than 5% of air cargo is ever screened for explosives, baggage screeners continue to use, error-prone approaches, and there’s a shortage of qualified screeners. DHS Inspector General, Clark Kent Ervin admitted that the TSA screeners and privately contracted workers perform “about the same, which is to say, equally poorly.” An internal DHS investigation revealed that “[u]ndercover investigators were able to sneak explosives and weapons past security screeners at 15 airports.” What’s more, Air Marshals fly on less than 5% of flights while Bush sought to scale back funding. [National Journal, 6/09/04; The Hill, 4/30/03; House Select Committee on Homeland Security; Dallas Morning News 9/9/04; Telegraph, 7/23/04; Union Leader, 4/23/04; AP, 6/01/04; USA Today 9/23/04]

    America still Vulnerable Because Terrorist Watch Lists Are Not Fully Accessible Or Integrated. According to news accounts, the terrorist aviation list only includes those who pose a danger to aviation. The federal ‘No-fly’ list still includes only suspected terrorists ‘who pose threats to civil aviation’ – not all suspected terrorists. “It’s just plain wrong,” said 9/11 Commissioner Slade Gorton. “The potential consequences are that terrorists can still get on aircraft in the United States.” On 9/11, only a dozen names were on the ‘No-fly’ list. Now there are about 3,500 names, only a fraction of more than 300,000 on the government’s main list of terror suspects.’ Those people could be couriers, operatives, or suicide bombers. “It doesn’t matter. You have to keep them all off [the list]” said terrorism expert Roger Cressey. [MSNBC, ‘No-fly’ list still lacking, 9/23/04 – citing Department of Homeland Security – Office of Inspector General. “DHS Challenges in Consolidating Terrorist Watch List Information.” OIG-04-31. August 2004; MSNBC, ‘No-fly’ list still lacking, 9/23/04]

    KERRY PLAN: John Kerry Will Step Up Aviation Security By Improving Screening of Cargo and Passengers for Explosives. In our airports, we’ll install the equipment to check passengers for explosives and to screen cargo just like we screen baggage. Instead of the current “Known Shipper” program, which screens a tiny fraction of the cargo on passenger planes, the Kerry-Edwards plan will significantly improve the screening of cargo carried on passenger planes. Instead of the current system, which essentially allows for spot checks of the highest-risk cargo, the new system will enable the screening of cargo like we screen bags. Their plan will provide for the development of the technology needed to make such screening feasible, as well as the personnel hiring needed to achieve it. The plan will also undertake additional security improvements that experts have called for, such as tightening background checks for employees of carriers.